Have you heard about "regression"?
The earliest form of regression
was the method of least squares (French: méthode des moindres carrés),
which was published by Legendre in 1805,and by Gauss in 1809. Legendre and Gauss both applied
the method to the problem of determining, from astronomical observations, the orbits of bodies about the Sun. Gauss published
a further development of the theory of least squares in 1821, including a version of the Gauss–Markov
theorem.
The term "regression"
was coined by Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin, in the nineteenth century to describe
a biological phenomenon. The phenomenon was that the heights of descendants of tall ancestors tend to regress down towards
a normal average.For Galton, regression had only this biological meaning, but his work was later extended by Udny Yule and Karl Pearson to a more general statistical context.In
the work of Yule and Pearson, the joint distribution of the response and explanatory variables is assumed to be Gaussian.
This assumption was weakened by R.A. Fisher in his works of 1922 and 1925. Fisher
assumed that the conditional distribution of the response variable is Gaussian, but the joint distribution need not be. In
this respect, Fisher's assumption is closer to Gauss's formulation of 1821.
Regression methods continue
to be an area of active research. In recent decades, new methods have been developed for robust regression, regression involving correlated responses
such as time series and growth curves, regression in which the predictor or response variables are curves, images, graphs,
or other complex data objects, regression methods accommodating various types of missing data, nonparametric regression, Bayesian methods for regression, regression in
which the predictor variables are measured with error, regression with more predictor variables than observations, and causal
inference with regression.
(Credits to Wikipedia. For more info
go to www.wikipedia.org).
Well, my first one was
a couple of years ago when I was about 15 and one of my best friends bought a book about how to make regressions by hypnosis,
so we decided to try that out...the resuls were incredible! I'm a christian but I also think that the mind itself it's a mistery
all humans want to know about. After this experience, I began to remember things from my own time and from other times that
didn't really belonged to me yet I somehow felt connected to it.
I started doing a research
about regressions and such, people that had done it, read books of Brian Weiss (very good books by the way, very interesting
stuff...)and I came to the conclusion that I really don't believe in actual 'reincarnation' like all people think it is like;
but that it works like a saying I've heard of: "By every dying creature that lived in this universe, another borns and takes
it's place". Meaning that we (or any other living thing), don't get to live another life or had any other life right before
this one; as a christian I must quote what the Bible says at it's start on Genesis 3:19 "By the sweat of your brow you
will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust you are and to dust you will return".
That has it's self explanation that "we
are dust and we will return to being dust and stay that way". Now, going back to that other saying I was telling...I
had the 'impression' that we don't 'reincarnate' BUT we are somehow 'connected' to that other person{s}(or living thing) that
were in our 'spacetime', I think that would be a little bit more coherent for me than 'dying and reviving into another person
with other physics and emotional differences'. While we're on this theory, what really made me think about this was the fact
of how I somehow was attracted for example at Japan which it's where that other person was from and other things
that got me thinking, that she was connected to me in someway, yet I never really felt like she was me
but a whole new human being that will never return to exist.
As I started to remember her life
in the spacetime she once had, the more I got intrigued by her story and the more I wanted to write about it! At first I wanted
to tweak it a bit, make it more into a fairytale where she's a princess and he's a commoner and forbidden love and stuff;
Yet, what she really was, it still would make it 'forbidden' and in her world she was 'the princess'. So,
with no further discussion I really invite you all to read this story that even if you believe it really happened or not,
it still will touch you in someway...I think that's what stories are all about, aren't they?